Search for: "Givens v. Rose" Results 701 - 720 of 1,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
”  Front and center in Bickel’s critique was Brown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm by Eric
Given the huge demand for it, I can't believe that poster is out-of-print! [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Copyright and patent don’t favor tweaking, though, given the control they give patentees and copyright owners over follow-on innovation/derivative works. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by Zachary Spilman
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994) 5, 7, 10 Computer Assocs. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:24 am by Administrator
Supreme Court on behalf of the plan and the PBGC, with Henry Rose, Mitchell L. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  In the first couple decades after 1900, the percentage of defendants pleading guilty rose from 50% to 72%; as the Supreme Court pointed out earlier this year in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
  But that's nowhere near the case here.So the Ninth Circuit gets a passing grade, but neither the district judge nor the plaintiffs' lawyer come out smelling like a rose. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Grace Capel
Counsel for Assange, Dinah Rose QC, surprised the Court by making the rare request of a stay in order to make an application for the court’s decision to be “re-opened”. [read post]