Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:17 am
Having discussed the criminality of the sale of grey goods last year (more here), the decision of the Court of Appeal was appealed by the defendants, ultimately ending up on the desk of the Supreme Court, which handed down its judgment in early August.The case of R v M, C and T concerned three defendants (including one company), who were engaged in the importation of branded goods into the UK that were manufactured outside the EU. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
This is a discussion of the jurisdictional merits of XYZ Corporation v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:29 pm
For employers and employees who want to understand those guidelines, a very good case to read is Vantage Technology, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
According to a Minnesota federal court in Mobile Mini, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:12 am
Should the shape be taken into account the mark could survive, but it looks like Louboutin might have to simply rely on their goodwill in passing off in the future. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 2:02 am
Read on:Natalie HillThere have been a number of cases recently dealing with “passing off”, being Global Vitality v Enzyme Process Africa (2015), Pioneer Foods v Bothaville Milling (2014) and Herbal Zone v Infitech Technologies (2017). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:45 pm
Poyser writes about Parker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
This was supported by Source Perrier SA v Fira-Less Marketing Co, [1983] 2 FC 18, para 20 and Green v Schwarz, (1986) 12 CPR (3d) 84, paras 4-5. [read post]
