Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
In the present case there were many instances – none of which the Court of Appeal appear to have noticed – of harm being done by prosecuting counsel and not being undone or even mitigated by the trial judge.It was said by no less a judge than Sir Mathew Hale (in The Trial of the Witches at Bury St Edmund’s (1665) 6 State Trials 647 at p.702) that “to condemn the innocent, and to let the guilty go free, were both abominations”. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:20 am
Hale v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
Martin Marietta Energy Sys., 832 S.W.2d 534, 538 (Tenn.1992); Hale v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
Lucido v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
Lucido v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am
Lady Hale expresses grave doubts about whether sending the case back to the High Court for further enquiries into the children’s states of mind would be a fruitful exercise [67]. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Powell, Hale, Commons, Cohen, and Dewey.All very well, but what impact does this “historicist turn” have on conventional versions of the living Constitution as well as the standard debate between this point of view and originalism? [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
By a 3:2 majority expressed “entirely obiter” (Brownlie II, at [45]) the Court had answered affirmatively: [48]-[55] (Baroness Hale), [56] (Lord Wilson) & [68]-[69] (Lord Clarke). [read post]
