Search for: "IN RE HOFFMAN" Results 701 - 720 of 953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 10:06 am by admin
I think the choice of Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep was exactly the right choice. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm by Emily Chan
" Peter Block: "What do you know that you're willing to teach? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
McGhee (@Yvonne_McGhee) March 13, 2015 … which refers to this slide: A young Dustin Hoffman learns about mobile. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by Sasha Romanosky
In a paper with the amazing David Hoffman and Alessandro Acquisti, we’re building a database of breach lawsuits and performing some interesting docket analysis on these suits. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:36 am by SHG
At Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman raises some interesting questions. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:32 pm by Salil Mehra
  As George Costanza would say, “you know, we’re living in a society. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:24 am by David Lat
We’ve heard opinions from members of both Team Robert and Team Lauren, and they’re not pretty. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 2009 WL 614484, *23 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2009). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm by Tom Heintzman
” The Supreme Court re-iterated the principle stated by Lord Justice Hoffman in another case to the effect that “if the language is capable of more than one construction, it is not necessary to conclude that a particular construction would produce an absurd or irrational result before having regard to the commercial purpose of the agreement. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
Hoffman, "Should you buy divorce insurance? [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 4:46 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., ___ A.2d ___, 2007 WL 923512 (N.J. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:48 am
Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group in Pittsburgh. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
” The Supreme Court re-iterated the principle stated by Lord Justice Hoffman in another case to the effect that “if the language is capable of more than one construction, it is not necessary to conclude that a particular construction would produce an absurd or irrational result before having regard to the commercial purpose of the agreement. [read post]