Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 701 - 720 of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
  With respect to these seventeen petitioners, the Executive Branch has determined not to allow them to enter the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Trent was convicted of a sex crime in Indiana in May of 2007.Trent asked the court to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the law violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:05 pm by Gregory Forman
 That Action Transmittal discusses the procedural components required for enforcing child support obligations in compliance with the United States Supreme Court decision in Turner v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Rogers M. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Justice Roger Traynor’s classic concurrence in Escola v. [read post]
One interesting aspect about this case is the discussion of the “Rogers test” which was established in Rogers v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Sandy Levinson
” In those states, one must hope that state courts enforcing their own constitutions—the United States constitution is one of only 51 in the entire United States, and the other 50 constitutions all differ from the United States Constitution in important ways—to preclude partisan gerrymandering. [read post]