Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
In the Lipitor MDL for diabetes litigation, Judge Gergel generally used sharp analyses to cut through the rancid fat of litigation claims, to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
In a symbolic show of force, the United States dispatched “a small armada” to patrol the disputed waters of the South China Sea, according to the Navy Times. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Anyone connected to the world of law is no doubt aware of the passing away over the weekend of Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
The latest decision from the NJ Appellate Division involving sex offenders, State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling [in Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
