Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
To destroy diversity, and keep the case in in South Carolina state court, plaintiff also sued local cell tower owners. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:31 am
It helped arrange for shipping of the goods to California and South Carolina for distribution throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:55 am
Fortunately, the South Carolina Supreme Court rejected that attempt last week. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Not so in South Carolina. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
The decision will have a wider impact in Virginia, because three other states located in the Fourth Circuit’s geographic area — North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia — have similar bans. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am
South Carolina NAACP, Lindke v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am
The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
The Commission was established in 1997 by constitutional amendment and its authority is set forth in Article V, § 27 of the South Carolina Constitution. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
