Search for: "WELLS v. EDWARDS" Results 701 - 720 of 2,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS Entertains Oral Argument on FERC Order 745, the “Demand Response” Rule
14 Oct 2015, 12:20 pm by Jon Wellinghoff
Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in FERC v. [read post]
Renewable + Law - http://www.lawofrenewableenergy.com/
US Supreme Court takes up case challenging Capitol riot obstruction charges
14 Dec 2023, 4:20 pm by William Hibbitts | JURIST Deputy Editorial Director
In Fischer v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Increasing the compensation of judges
16 Nov 2008, 12:07 pm
Naming Edward A. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Breaking News: Federal District Court, in 151-Page Opinion, Upholds Constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am by Rick Hasen
In a comprehensive and careful 151-page opinion, a federal district court in Shelby County v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Time On My Mind
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 am by SHG
’”  It is time for Professor Cohen to be educated, and I am happy to do it: In the subtle sexism case of Hopkins v. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
Employment Law Alert - http://www.employmentlawalert.com
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
IP Law Alert - http://www.iplawalert.com
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
Real Property & Environmental Law Alert - http://www.rpelawalert.com/
Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Courts have invalidated or limited the scope of perpetuity provisions in other contexts as well. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
“Say No to This”: Courts Must Stop Holding that Firing Attractive Women Is Not Sex Discrimination
30 May 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Dilek Edwards worked as a yoga and massage therapist at Wall Street Chiropractic and Wellness, located in the heart of the financial district and presumably serving a high-end clientele. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Ruling Provides Roadmap For Navigating Transactions With Fiduciary on Both Sides
25 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Posted by Edward B. [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/
Ruling Provides Roadmap For Navigating Transactions With Fiduciary on Both Sides
25 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Posted by Edward B. [read post]
Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu
commercial advertising or promotion post-Lexmark
20 Mar 2015, 11:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tobinick v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Saint-Gobain Adfors SAS v 3M Innovative Properties Co [2022] EWHC 1666 (Pat), 28 Jun 2022 (consequential decision) and Saint-Gobain Adfors SAS v 3M Innovative Properties Co [2022] EWHC 1018 (Pat), 9 May 2022 (substantive judgment)
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The invalidity argument due to uncertainty type insufficiency failed as well as the case that it would require an undue burden to produce something within the claims (see paragraphs 232-234). [read post]
Kluwer Patent Blog - http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/
UK Law Firm Risk News — Conditional Fee Conflicts Considered, AML/Client Due Diligence Compliance Costs Clyde
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
This reiterates the age-old lesson that solicitors must not prioritise their own interest (or the interests of one client at the expense of another) otherwise they risk incurring liability for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, as well as possible regulatory exposure. [read post]
Bressler Risk Blog - http://www.bresslerriskblog.com
What’s On Their Minds: Interpreting the Meaning of “Transacts Business” under R.C. 4117.13(D). Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority v. State Employment Relations Board et al.
22 Aug 2016, 6:28 am by MBettman
On August 17, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Lather, rinse, repeat: horse shampoo TM case continues
11 Apr 2009, 2:52 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Passing Hypotheses Off as Causal Conclusions – Allen v. Martin Surfacing
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
The published case report by Ratner helps demonstrate that Allen v. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
Case Law, South Africa: Manuel v Economic Freedom Fighters, The legal consequences of fake news – Dario Milo
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  The panel ultimately unanimously recommended Edward Kieswetter, and President Ramaphosa in due course accepted the recommendation. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Federal Judge Returns South Carolina Case to State Court
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Similarly, in Burcaw v. [read post]
Anglican Curmudgeonr - http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/