Search for: "Weinstein Productions"
Results 701 - 720
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
I said that if production of a minimally adequate case is what the confrontation right meant, it would have become apparent long ago. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
With particular regard to the re-creation of copyright-protected works (as it would have been the case of Selma, should Oyelowo/King had reproduced actual extracts from King's speeches), it is worth recalling the recent (2014) decision of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in Arrow Productions v The Weinstein Company.As readers might remember, this case concerned Deep Throat's Linda Lovelace biopic,… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Eric Freedman, Richard Garnett, Seth Kreimer, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein, arguing that the court should hear the case.) [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
[Eric’s introduction: in my blog post on the copyrightability of resumes, I observed that “2014 has been a terrific year for fair use” and mused that “It would be great if someone did a ‘top 10 fair use rulings of 2014′ post. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:24 am
When Judge Weinstein appointed her to chair a committee to search for appropriate court-appointed expert witnesses in the silicone gel breast implant litigation, Professor Berger proved a careful, impartial listener to all the parties involved. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
In one of his published decisions, Judge Jack Weinstein reported an informal survey of judges of the Eastern District of New York, on what they believed were the correct quantizations of legal burdens of proof. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:31 am
Sure, this is not without some US parallel given Weinstein’s collaboration with Netflix on the “Crouching Tiger” sequel; but the momentum and potential scale are so much greater here in China. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:07 am
Schwenkel, and Gail Weinstein. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Thus, Judge Jack Weinstein, writing after the death of Dr. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:17 am
Richter, Steven Epstein, David Shine, and Gail Weinstein. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:03 pm
utm_content=buffer9c31f Deadmau5 vs Disney…the battle continues http://torrentfreak.com/touche-deadmau5-accuses-disney-pirating-music-140905/ http://variety.com/2014/biz/news/disney-deadmau5-ears-lawsuit-1201297256/ http://variety.com/2014/biz/news/disney-defends-effort-to-halt-deadmau5s-mouse-ears-trademark-1201299168/ http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/legal-and-management/6243716/deadmau5-fires-back-at-disneys-trademark-opposition… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:35 pm
”(...)Indeed, Weinstein’s thin attempts toexplain his 10% deviation from the 50/50 baseline in thiscase demonstrates how this methodology is subject toabuse. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Griesa from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd v The Weinstein Company L.L.C. et al, 1:13-cv-05488. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
A federal judge has dismissed lawsuit filed by Arrow Productions, the owner of the copyright in the 1972 iconic porn movie “Deep Throat”. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
Griesa from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dismissed the copyright and trademark infringement complaint of Plaintiff Arrow Productions against Defendants The Weinstein Company LLC, the producers of the movie Lovelace. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:37 am
Weinstein Co., LLC (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: ‘Deep Throat’ Production Company Loses ‘Lovelace’ Copyright Case First off today, Nate Raymond at Reuters reports that a judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Arrow Productions Ltd. against The Weinstein Company, the group that produced the movie “Lovelace”, a biographical film about the life of “Deep Throat” star Linda Lovelace. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
See In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
The recent issue of Environmental Health Perspectives contains several interesting articles on scientific methodology of interest to lawyers who litigate claimed health effects.[1] The issue also contains a commentary that argues for greater transparency in science and science policy, which should be a good thing, but yet the commentary has the potential to obscure and confuse. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
And speaking of privacy, Jason Weinstein discloses a long-secret Steptoe project – a free data breach legal toolkit. [read post]
