Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
But Triumph wasn’t satisfied with a mere $50. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
As a threshold matter, we must address whether Blake and Moore have standing to make this challenge. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am
“The ideas of liberty and equality have been an irresistible force in motivating leaders like Patrick Henry, Susan B. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
Isn’t that process a simple fill-in-the-blank application and fill-in-the-blank search warrant? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The adoption of the CAT, therefore, was—and remains—a matter of significant controversy, as well as the subject of considerable interest for policymakers and tax economists. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Id. at 1549 ("[T]he violation of a procedural right granted by statute can be sufficient in some circumstances to constitute injury in fact. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:01 am
I don’t know the person’s name. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
"As to Eastchester recouping "past overpayments" from Fennelly, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Masullo v City of Mount Vernon, 141 AD3d 95, said that "[t]here is no evidence that [Eastchester] had a process or application procedure in place at the time [Fennelly] was paid the section 207-a(2) benefits and, therefore, there can be no finding that the prior payments were improper so as to justify recoupment. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:56 am
It makes no difference that, for most of them, their lawyers (a) are not located in Austin and (b) didn't know pet law is actually a thing (yeah, it is). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
Wis.1983) (noting that § 1400(b) “demonstrates . . . a need fornationwide uniformity” offered by the Federal Circuit),and this court “has a mandate to achieve uniformity inpatent matters,” Panduit Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:55 am
Charges didn’t need to name affiliated corporations. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
§ 973(b)(2). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:00 am
DON’T! [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
., at § 15061(b)(2)), including the commonly invoked “unusual circumstances” exception at issue in this case, which posits that “[a] categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
., at § 15061(b)(2)), including the commonly invoked “unusual circumstances” exception at issue in this case, which posits that “[a] categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:57 am
(b) The party seeking exculpation is engaged in performing a service of great importance to the public, which is often a matter of practical necessity for some members of the public. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 3:58 am
As you can see, the matter is complex. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:03 am
This isn't the typical copyright story! [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:27 am
Within the ranks of those who were conscripted, the PBS broadcast recalled, there was a bitter refrain about the college boys who were exempted and stayed home: “If you’ve got the dough, you don’t have to go. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Since the decision to reject the application only deals with other matters, it appears fitting that the appellant should have a possibility to have its arguments considered at two instances should this be required.This decision T 914/13 (pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T091413.20170720. [read post]
