Search for: "People v A. M." Results 7221 - 7240 of 12,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm by Nate Russell
I’m a bit of a word nut. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, note that the government may generally insist that, when it hires people to communicate a government message, those people use that government money only for the government-selected speech (see Rust v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Minh Tran
In the famous case of Terry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm by John N. Davis
Even the courts are taking an interest: Bell Canada v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:47 am
I'm not sure how effective the cause of action against people who viewed the child pornography is going to be, though. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
In M v H, [107] Martha McCarthy, who was then a junior lawyer, bravely took on a case that would make history. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 8:06 am by Eugene Volokh
(Some people have argued that the Religious Test Clause specifically forbids the consideration of religion even in high-level appointments, but I'm skeptical about that, and in any event that provision refers solely to religion.) [read post]
30 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
About two weeks ago, the entire United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by a 10-5 vote, declined to exercise en banc review of an important 2024 voting-rights case, Republican National Committee v. [read post]