Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 7281 - 7300 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 4:16 pm by Shea Denning
Thus, “‘[i]f the harm that results from compliance with the law is greater than the harm that will result from a violation, then the person is justified in violating the law. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:54 pm by Erin Bolan Hines
., 846 F.3d 909 (7th Cir. 2017) as distinguishable because it involved an alleged violation of the Cable Communications Policy Act based on the defendant retaining the plaintiff’s “social security number,” which is data excluded from the definition of a “biometric” under BIPA. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff has to show “(1) [s]he is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) the defendant is subject to one of the Acts; and (3) [s]he was denied the opportunity to participate in or benefit from the defendant's services, programs, or activities, or was otherwise discriminated against by the defendant because of [her] disability. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:55 pm by Thorsten Bausch
Thorsten BauschAbstract This will be a very long post (sorry, dear readers!) [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It also has to consider whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
The rapporteur should also be replaced on the basis of Article 24(3)EPC given that the communication accompanying the summons was not compliant with Article 11 of RPBA and infringed the right to be heard (Article 113 EPC),(c) the Board be enlarged to include a legally qualified member acquainted with the complexity of the right to be heard issue pursuant to Article 21(3)(b) EPC) and Article 9 RPBA,(d) the oral proceedings be postponed and new summons be issued by the new composition… [read post]