Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 11,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
Some people champion children’s issues; others promote immigration reform, or perhaps they favor housing rights. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:47 am
The case Kilopass v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am
Viewing this evidence in a light most favorable to the employee, the court found that the agency’s proffered non-discriminatory reasons were pretextual due to weaknesses, inconsistencies, and contradictions. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
With certiorari now denied, the most we can hope for is that the Trilogy’s fraud on the market rationale might fall with a favorable decision on that theory in the Halliburton securities case. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
The stars seem to be aligned in Goliath's favor. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
See Barrow v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
I write instead about the predictable fallout of the usual screaming matches that come up whenever a social issue rears its head, the old left v. right kind of thing, though perhaps when it comes to gay rights it’s more accurate to speak of those who favor greater government intervention and those who want the government to keep its nose out of people’s private business. [read post]
