Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 17,257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Rolls Royce, PLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Porter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:54 am
") AC36250 - State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
§ 1125(c))• Count V - Federal Cybersquatting - ACPA and Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
CAFC in Shukh: concrete and particularized reputational injury can give rise to Article III standing
2 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
SHUKH v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:39 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Theft Jonathan Luis Badillo (“Badillo”) was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of two counts of theft of property with a value less than $1,000, and one count of theft of property with a value between $1,000 and $10,000. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals) seems to have taken an opportunity to re-state, in clear terms, one of the findings of SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [Our report here]. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Human trafficking Appellant, Bennie Lavar Veasey, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of two counts of human trafficking under Maryland Code (2002, 2012 Repl. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:11 am
On Friday, the en banc Federal Circuit will hear argument in Lexmark v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:35 am
The Supreme Court’s decision now allows local authorities to apply reasonable residency restrictions as demanded by the particulars of each case. [1] People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am
Can we count on one institution, one made up of nine flawed individuals, to have the answer? [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 5:47 am
") AC36567 - State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
