Search for: "Works v. State" Results 7301 - 7320 of 60,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
They tend to be driven forward by claimant law firms working in cooperation with litigation funders. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Authority of an employer to prohibit an employee's legal use of marijuana as permitted by state lawLance Carlson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Authority of an employer to prohibit an employee's legal use of marijuana as permitted by state lawLance Carlson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
” [Perotti v Pine Plains CSD, 218 AD2d 803, leave to appeal denied 88 NY2d 802]Terminating a school bus driver who used excessive force to deal with unruly students but who had just received a very positive work evaluation. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Yesterday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court published its 5-2 decision in the case of Gillard v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The final version is expected to be published with the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law whose staff I look forward to working with. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
He stated that his rate in these cases was $200 per hour, and that he had probably worked 40-50 hours on this case. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:05 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Due to the advent of remote working capabilities, there are often cases when the non-compete laws of more than one state may be implicated. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm by John Ehrett
Bunnell 14-1140Issue: Whether state law may nullify the federal “patient safety work product” privilege, or whether, instead, the Kentucky Supreme Court erred by interpreting it not to protect information “normally contained in” documents subject to state reporting or recordkeeping requirements. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Dagg v. [read post]