Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 7321 - 7340 of 9,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Schachtman
The phrase is vague and ambiguous; its use, inconsistent.4  Even authors sympathetic to the WOE mission have reluctantly concluded that the term is most often used in a way that “does not lend itself to transparency or repeatability except in simple cases. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:52 am by Ryan Emenaker
The current Chief Justice, John Roberts, is the youngest appointee to the Court in two hundred years. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:51 am by Jim Sedor
While the romance does not violate any rules, it has raised concerns among some good government groups. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
§ 2331(1)) or domestic terrorism (as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan notes that in this case, the court does not have the records in question—they remain with the National Archives. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States, argued on December 1, the issue is over the statute of limitations in a contract dispute with the federal government. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Greg Jenner
Preliminary work, such as planning and design, securing financing, researching, and site clearing, does not qualify. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
"With regard to assessing constitutional questions, there are two (polar) possibilities:1) One needs to be a trained lawyer in order to have an informed opinion on what the Constituiton means. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
" When Teleflex's attorney noted that his position is supported by the major patent bar associations, Chief Justice John Roberts retorted, "Which way does that cut? [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Sex Offender Issues
"I have 15 grandkids and it scares me to no end that these kids play outside and any moment someone can walk by and grab them," says John Polchinski, Utica resident. - Even if we had ZERO sex offenders, that could still happen, and it does happen all the time. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
On 28 June 2012, the Court dismissed the Applicants’ appeal, and upheld the constitutionality of ACA by five votes to four, with Chief Justice John Roberts’ vote proving decisive. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
Does it matter to NSSTA whether such a communication precedes, or responds to, an inquiry about factoring from a structured settlement recipient? [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
 Justice Stevens does not point to one in his essay and, to my knowledge, the closest the Court has ever come to articulating this view was in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:34 pm by Duncan Hollis
 That said, I’ve got three complaints about the set-up and the content of the so-called “debate” itself: 1) Where is the international law view? [read post]