Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
In Ling v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
As the Chief Justice concluded: Speech is powerful. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
The company announced an “innovation fund” this week that places bets on a couple of key technologies, chief among them RISC-V, a free, open source instruction set that shows promise in low-power and embedded systems, markets that are expected to grow significantly over the next several years.Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm
It would give Congress the power to impose any mandate of any kind. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
Saying it's super powerful doesn't make it so. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:59 am
Alvarez-Machain, Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
From Allergan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Boschma v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:14 am
Case Citation: Mercola.com, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 7:39 pm
University of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
B’s case turned on the power to grant bail. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
It is, in reality, regulation, and Congress lacks a power to require the states to set up the exchanges. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Twitter * Second Circuit Issues Powerful Section 230 Win to Facebook in “Material Support for Terrorists” Case–Force v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on the power of government agencies to impose strict conditions on their willingness to issue a development permit, in the case of Koontz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
FWIW, trademark law doesn’t create a veto power over listings in consumer reviews, either. [read post]
