Search for: "Brady v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2024, 10:53 am
The only decision Combs identifies that appears to involve a bar on speech by all potential witnesses is United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm
With that, Judge Spath lays out his plans for the day: The court will hold two open sessions before and after lunch, with a classified 505 hearing later in the afternoon on the defense’s Brady motion. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
United States, 367 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:05 am
Under Brady v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Much of the tax will be borne by in-state companies and individuals. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957)”. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
V. [read post]
