Search for: "Coats v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2013, 7:54 am by Scott Deatherage
  My practice has involved projects and issues in states all across the country, but I decided to focus on those that state or federal agnencies issue in Texas. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
  Even though it could be done at no cost to the state. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:16 am by Sean Wajert
All states require proof of reliance and causation. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The same ‘white lab coat’ problem − that the jury will not be able to figure out the expert’s missteps − would seem to apply equally to basis, methodology and application. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]