Search for: "Cooper v. California" Results 721 - 740 of 1,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
At different points in this litigation, both sides have dodged sensible opportunities to litigate cooperatively. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Marsy’s Law [which requires advance notification to victims parole and related proceedings], despite its obviously expansive protection of victims’ rights does not restrict the executive’s clemency powers under California Constitution, article V, section 8, subdivision (a) or the clemency statutes, and we must affirm the judgment. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
  This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:56 am by Venkat Balasubramani
California’s New Law Shows It’s Not Easy To Regulate Revenge Porn (Forbes Cross-Post) Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment–Pennsylvania v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by UChicagoLaw
Epstein started his legal career at the University of Southern California, where he taught from 1968 to 1972. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by UChicagoLaw
Epstein started his legal career at the University of Southern California, where he taught from 1968 to 1972. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:29 pm
” This clear-and-convincing-evidence standard, the court held in today’s Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm by Lorene Park
For example: Although a car dealership cooperated with the NRLB in an investigation over its 2010 handbook provisions on social media, gave the NLRB proposed revisions, and issued a new 2013 handbook after the agency’s review, the Board, in a 2-1 decision found that publication of the new handbook did not effectively repudiate the offending provisions. [read post]