Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 721 - 740
of 6,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 2:47 am
They argued inter alia that (i) the contested design is a component of a complex product that does not remain visible during normal use (art. 4(2)); (ii) it consists exclusively of technically functional features (art. 8(1)); and (iii) the snap fasteners are a must-fit element, for which design protection is void (art. 8(2)).The Cancellation Division had rejected these claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Hard to do without statutory change. 1A and Article III standing are there, but worrisome; casualness over stare decisis does suggest courts are willing to look at things from scratch—Vintage Brands; Netchoice—everything might be up for grabs. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
If I have a shoe brand and want to collaborate w/some artists and not others. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:40 am
Nasdaq also proposes to amend Listing Rule 5810(c)(2)(A)(iii) to provide that a company that failed to comply with proposed Listing Rule 5608 must submit to Nasdaq Staff a plan to regain compliance. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:18 pm
The EU has proposed that this aspect of the committees’ deliberative function be specifically expanded to address three thematic areas: (i) trade policy and state intervention in support of industrial sectors; (ii) trade and global environmental challenges; and (iii) trade and inclusiveness. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
I. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Triple purple packaging particulars put through their paces – with predominant success! [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
The Arizona Supreme Court concluded that it does not. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:01 am
The Act is unclear as to whether (i) employers must modify their existing policies to permit leave to be used for any reason; (ii) existing policies must comport with the Act’s other requirements; and (iii) employers who are covered by municipal or county ordinances requiring a form of paid leave must comply with the Act’s other provisions. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
I. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
This distinction plays out across the second and third prong of the Howey test, which examines whether there was (i) an investment of money (ii) in a common enterprise (iii) with a reasonable expectation of profit derived from the efforts of others. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Argument I. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
"I can never understand how two men can write a book together; to me that's like three people getting together to have a baby. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
"I can never understand how two men can write a book together; to me that's like three people getting together to have a baby. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
Man: I would not. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
The word “publisher” does not encompass every party involved in the dissemination of an unlawful statement. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:05 am
The Assembly provides for the administrative expenses through assessed contributions from States Parties. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
I argue that JASTA provides poor delineation between these two categories. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
While section III does state that WotC owns both the licensed and unlicensed content, as defined in the OGL section I(A), neither of those categories include content made by the licensee. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
Part I of this Symposium discussed the reasons why the United States should contribute to the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) Trust Fund for Victims. [read post]
