Search for: "INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INC." Results 721 - 740 of 2,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
While not manufacturing any of its own products, Phigenix purportedly “has developed, and is developing, an extensive intellectual property portfolio” that it claims includes a patent that covers Genentech’s activities relating to the breast cancer drug Kadcyla. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lexmark International, Inc., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Briefing: Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Thanks to those of you who attended the "Intellectual Property & Federalism" panel at AALS, moderated by Jennifer Rothman and organized by Joe Miller. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am by Jeffrey May
In August, the FTC and Antitrust Division sought feedback on proposed updates to the Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property or “IP Licensing Guidelines. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:11 pm by Schachtman
Of course, in many other situations, the motive to create misleading documents will arise from the expectation of the possibility or probability of future litigation over intellectual or real property rights, insurance contracts, etc. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am by Dwayne Sam and Megan Brown
Not because the proposed mark was inaccurate or misleading or violated someone’s intellectual property interests. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This analysis largely tracks that of the intellectual property professors’ amicus brief she authored with Christine Haight Farley, which in turn draws heavily on Tushnet’s forthcoming article in the Notre Dame Law Review, “The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
"Will this still be an issue if the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill is passed - current draft here? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:36 am by Steven Boutwell
Valuable Non-Personal Data: A construction companies often have access to certain proprietary client documents including project bid data, architectural designs, trade secrets, and other intellectual property. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 3:05 am by Ben
From producers and engineers, to performing rights organizations and genre organizations that promote everything from Americana and blues to classical, Christian, gospel and country to hip-hop, jazz, pop, rock, R&B, and everything in between.So much of what you wrote in your platform this summer about intellectual property and private property rights resonated with many of us, including:“Intellectual property is a driving force in today’s… [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:53 am by Howard Knopf
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)KeywordsAdministrative law - Interlocutory orders, Injunctions, Private international law, Extraterritoriality, Communications law, Internet, Intellectual property, Industrial design.SummaryCase summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ebert, Say Good-Night, Gracie, Intellectual Property Today (June 2003):** See also the 2009 IPBiz post "Trolls on top? [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
In his book, Wassom considers AR through the prism of various established legal fields, such as privacy, advertising, intellectual property, real property, torts and criminal law. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
JP Morgan, No. 16-359 (appeal from 5th Circuit) (Whether a most-favored licensee (“MFL”) clauses in an intellectual property license agreement applies retrospectively to require refund if better terms are later given to another licensee?) [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:50 am by Dan Harris
And when it comes to IP litigation, China has specialized IP courts whose judges tend to be well versed in intellectual property matters, both factually and legally. [read post]