Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 721 - 740 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 4:13 am by Broc Romanek
I'm happy to say that I'm heading down there this morning to watch the Supreme Court deliberate the future of the PCAOB (and possibly reshape other aspects of Sarbanes-Oxley too - see this Bloomberg article) when it considers Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:55 am by Jack J. Gravelle
On April 11, 2012, the SEC issued FAQs to provide guidance regarding Title V and Title VI of the JOBS Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 12:57 pm
")   As reported in The New York Times Scalia was on the losing side of U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" For past recycling of Lemley by Mullin, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.htmlElsewhere, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) reminds us of Stevens' first case:The first case Justice Stevens authored was Parker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Randy Miller and Randy Shaheen of Venable on the firm’s blog, All About Advertising Law Top 10 Developments/Headlines in Trade Secret, Computer Fraud, and Non-Compete Law in 2013 – Los Angeles lawyers Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Estate of Michael Jackson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:46 am by Broc Romanek
The full agendas for the Conferences are posted - but the panels include: - Keynote: "Keith Higgins, Director, SEC's Division of Corporation Finance" - Keynote: "Former Congressman Mike Oxley"- Q&A with ISS - Q&A with Glass Lewis - Say-on-Pay Shareholder Engagement: The Investors Speak - Compensation Committees & Advisors: The NYSE & Nasdaq Speak - Realizable Pay Disclosure: How to Do It - How to Improve Pay-for-Performance Disclosure - We Don't Have a Good Pay… [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:52 am by Geoff Schweller
“Kohn has helped draft key whistleblower legislation and regulation, including those incorporated into the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank acts. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Larry Ribstein
Filed under: sarbanes-oxley, securities litigation, securities regulation [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by William McGrath
Jenkins made $2,091,020 in bonuses and $2,018,893 in company stock sales during that time that should have been reimbursed to CSK Auto pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:10 am by Mike Delikat
” She also noted an upward spike in the number of tips following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Somers v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the statute is clear, the Court did not accord deference to the SEC’s contrary rulemaking (Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States:  Is throwing a fish overboard a violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was supposed to be about reforming financial institutions? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:55 pm by Robin E. Shea
Most of you have probably heard by now about the ruling from a federal court in New York in Wang v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court uses this case to clarify the correct legal standard guiding these claims.The case is Murray v. [read post]