Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 3:03 am
[v][vi] This statistic alone highlights the most significant driver of the massive industry growth: people enjoy watching other people play video games, and are willing to pay to have a quality experience. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
In DeShaney v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
THE VOTE - has the decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly improved the law? [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:47 am
As stated above, section 80 of the Patents Act does not make any reference to the court. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am
Some win their appeals pro se, which is noteworthy because they are not lawyers and face off against highly skilled state lawyers. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
In 2010 during Hartfield v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary on Jesner v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:56 am
Lewis, Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
KSR v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
” (Mary Wanjuhi Muigai v Attorney General & another [2015] eKLR para. 64). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:32 am
Jacobs, which held that the discovery rule did not apply to professional negligence claims.) [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 2:05 pm
Judge Jacobs filed a separate dissenting opinion (Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am
The Town of Oyster Bay enacted this law to restrict immigrants from seeking work as day laborers.The case is Centro De La Comunidad v. [read post]
