Search for: "State v. James E. Grant" Results 721 - 740 of 922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The government argues that the decision below is correct and “th[e] question arises far less often than [Rudisill] suggests. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
" In that case, a former Kentucky state official, James E. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that Section 533 precluded coverage for the underlying settlement. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
§§ 2251(e), 2252(b), and 2252A(b); the predicate offense for firearms mandatory minimums under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources ‘Into the Bowels of Hell’ Examining Online Defamation Law Through the Twitter Account of James Woods, Southern Law Journal Volume XXIX (2)- Fall 2019, Jessica Magaldi, Pace University, Wade Davis, Minnesota State University Mankato Journalistic Exemption under the European Data Protection Law, Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis, Policy Paper Series, 2020, Natalija Bitiukova, Human Rights Monitoring Institute The First Amendment and the Right(s)… [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 8 December 2020 the High Court of Australia granted the defendants’ permission to appeal in the case of Voller v Fairfax Media Publications and Ors [2020] NSWCA 102. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The European Commission will launch a public consultation to clarify the procedures for notice-and-action procedures and the EU’s E-Commerce Directive, reports Out-law.com. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
CV 061436)The treatment and management of condemned inmates from the time an executiondate is set through completion of the execution is subject to a protocol issued on May 15,2007, by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) andCDCR Secretary James E. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Dianne Saxe
  Dianne Saxe and Meredith James This article was prepared for the excellent blog SLAW ©2012 Environmental Law and Litigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  The argument that Congress in 1872 had prospectively shielded Cawthorn from a Section 3 challenge lodged 150 years later—a tortured, ahistorical, purportedly textualist argument—had been advanced by Cawthorn’s lawyer, veteran Republican elections attorney James Bopp, Jr. [read post]