Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 721 - 740 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” In Pason Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 8:02 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In 2014, the same Court had itself revoked certain claims relating to particular dosages for administering raloxifene, on the grounds that they were excluded from patentability (Paris Court of Appeal, 12 March 2014, Eli Lilly and company et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm by PunditMom
His apparent feminist awakening didn’t happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by admin
In 1947, the Supreme Court, in Lillie v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am by John Collins
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Congress only addressed the second part of the High Court’s decision in the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, Copus noted, emphasizing that all the Act does is extend the charge filing period indefinitely when a Title VII claimant challenges a discrete pay decision. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Eli Lilly Co., 2011 WL 2621067, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am by Thorsten Bausch
The ruling of the CJEU brings to mind the test proposed by Warren J. in Eli Lilly v Human Genom Sciences [2014] EWHC 2404 (Pat) (18 July 2014)). [read post]