Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 721 - 740
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 5:46 am
King Tuna, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:47 am
"Brinkmeier v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 12:17 pm
Mitzi the dog is a rescue and was taken in an emaciated state from the streets but is now a fit 4 months old. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association: Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:49 am
Martens v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
But on the narrow issue of conservative v. something else--well, kudos to Mark for trying. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known resolution to date. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:32 am
Other examples are where the further dealings might seriously damage the reputation of the trade mark (see Portakabin Ltd v Primakabin, Case C-588/08 and Viking Gas v Kosan Gas, Case C-46/10) or give the impression that there is a commercial connection between the person responsible for those dealings and the trade mark proprietor and, in particular, the impression that that person’s business is somehow affiliated to the trade mark proprietor or… [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:38 am
Bureau National Interprofessionel du Cognac, Institute National de Appellations d'Origine v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:56 am
Braille Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
ESRT Empire State Building, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:56 pm
”); NuVasive,842 F.3d at 1385 (stating that when the PTAB fails toarticulate its rationale, “judicial review cannot meaningfullybe achieved” (internal quotation marks, brackets,and citation omitted)). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
"V. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:33 am
Best Chairs Incorporated v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
And Mark Sommerhauser of The Wisconsin State Journal reports that “SCOTUS changes prompt new focus on Wisconsin’s long-dormant abortion ban. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
