Search for: "United States v. Arenas"
Results 721 - 740
of 924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Zherka v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Zherka v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:54 pm
Switzer, the United States Supreme Court decided that prisoners can sue under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
UNITED STATES, 182 U.S. 516; 21 S. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 131 S.Ct. 795 (2010), now pending before the United States Supreme Court, discrimination cases still are being brought and may, under the proper circumstances, be certified. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
Faculty Research Brief Series In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize people’s right to privacy: a legal entitlement to an intimate life of one’s own free from undue interference by the state and others. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Men charged with breaching sanctions against Iraq in 2002 fail to convince Supreme Court that the UK had no power to create a criminal offence under the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Professor David Kaye collected examples of statistical blunders from published cases in a 1986 law review, and again in his chapter on statistical evidence in the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence created a list of erroneous interpretations: United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
There is a further important question as to whom those "internal accountability" monitors should themselves account - in the transborder NGO arena, regulators of which countries? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
§292(b) is unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Crespin-Valladares v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:08 pm
In Katzenbach v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Reminds me of those catchy names plaintiff's groups often use (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:18 am
This is the alternative holding of United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
The international investment arena, with its myriad ad hoc tribunals and legal doctrines enshrined in treaties that either codify or build on customary international law, offers an excellent laboratory in which to theorize about communication between the nuclei and when such communication is appropriate. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
We have already posted about the most recent, MGN v United Kingdom. [read post]
