Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
If shoppers who see a clearly branded label will immediately know it is not the product they intended to buy, then one cannot rely on elements of that label to support passing-off on the basis of customers not seeing the label and being confused nonetheless. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
If shoppers who see a clearly branded label will immediately know it is not the product they intended to buy, then one cannot rely on elements of that label to support passing-off on the basis of customers not seeing the label and being confused nonetheless. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
Healthcare Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
Two AFPD wins:U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
STACY LIPSCOMB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:10 am
Rufo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
The Court labeled this the “occurrence rule. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Brock v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
The suit, D'Arelli v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Western Sugar Co-op. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:03 am
Assénagon Asset Management SA v Irish Bank Resolution Corpn Ltd: [2012] EWHC 2090 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 243 “A challenge to the legality of a technique used by the issuers of corporate bonds which had acquired the label ‘exit consent’ succeeded on the ground that it was not lawful for the majority bondholders to lend its aid to the coercion of a minority by voting for a resolution which expropriated the minority’s rights… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:13 pm
John Ossenmacher, the founder of ReDigi, has been sued by the record labels for copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:17 am
[because] the generic maker cannot alter the labeling. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]