Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 7521 - 7540 of 12,453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 7:05 pm by JP Sarmiento
  He can now work for his employer for three years on an H-1B status, and he did not have to wait for April 1 for the petition filing, nor October 1 to start working. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Furthermore, defendant provides clothing, toys, etc., for the children while at his residence, and does not rely on plaintiff to provide those items." [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
 The Court of Appeal rejected this on the basis that these issues were not questions of law but were “pre-eminently questions of evaluative judgement for the expert appellate tribunal” [26], [27] which the Upper Tribunal Judge was entitled to reach. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
 The Court of Appeal rejected this on the basis that these issues were not questions of law but were “pre-eminently questions of evaluative judgement for the expert appellate tribunal” [26], [27] which the Upper Tribunal Judge was entitled to reach. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
The essential inquiry under the first factor can be separated into two parts: whether the new work is transformative and the extent to which the use serves a commercial purpose.[1] The Google Books project had two aspects (1) digitizing copies of books for the purpose of making them available to the supplying libraries for their purposes, and (2) digitizing copies for indexing, creating a database, and providing snippets to the public in response to search queries. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am by Schachtman
Bradford Hill, “The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report,” 1 Br. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm by Bob Lawless
"The Correspondence Bias," Psychological Bulletin, 117, no. 1:21-38. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Cnty. of Essex, 209 N.J. 51, 56 n.1 (2012).The parties are sisters and decedent's only children. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 11:35 am by Guest Author
  The employer does not reduce the reportable cost for income imputed to the employee for the coverage (such as coverage for domestic partners or adult children over 27). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:03 am by Beth Graham
Next, the appeals court addressed the second alleged impasse, Carey Salt’s claims regarding the June 27 implementation are without merit. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by emagraken
  Both have legal costs arising from the litigation. [27]         There are no other factors raised by Mr. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am by MBettman
On June 27, 2011, the trial court granted the motion and entered judgment in favor of Bank of America; the Kuchtas did not appeal the judgment. [read post]