Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 7521 - 7540
of 71,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
” Rath v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 8:47 am
Contents include:Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko, A sin committed by the (suspended) SADC Tribunal : the erosion of state sovereignty in the SADC region Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi, The principle of non-refoulement in South Africa and the exclusion from refugee status of asylum seekers who have committed offences abroad : a comment on Gavric v Refugee Status Determination Officer, Cape Town and Others Michelle Frances Diers, The historical development of international organisations with… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Freed and Dan Carroll (Center for Political Accountability) and William S. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Balbin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Disposal As above, the respondent (CPS)’s arguments found favour with the majority, such that TRA is capable of coming within CJA 1988, s 134 despite not having a “State” position at the relevant time. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Rodgers v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2017 decision in Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Though Walker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:50 am
" State Farm, 463 U.S. at 43 (citation omitted). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
R.C.P. 1019 that there must be supporting facts pled for such claims to stand.The other line of cases more liberally allow for claims of recklessness to proceed in this context as a general allegation that asserts the tortfeasor's state of mind at the time of the accident.In those cases in which the Preliminary Objections against allegations of recklessness and/or punitive damages are sustained, it is typically provided by the court that the plaintiff may revisit the issue by… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
In the Court’s view, this was just an exception. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
R. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
Grossman and George R. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am
R. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:48 am
And the Court also split 4-4 in Texas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Assn. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
But "[u]nder the Erie doctrine, federal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law and federal procedural law," Gasperini v. [read post]
