Search for: "Long v State" Results 7561 - 7580 of 45,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen looks at the “long short list” of potential advocates in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Although BIO and the undersigned higher education associations held different views on the Stanford v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:51 am by Guest Blogger
  That is, as long as we avert a constitutional crisis in November. [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm by Holman
In another article, Amgen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Daniel Hemel
Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett has long lamented the fact that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 10:07 pm by Jason Shinn
Turning to the particular case (Cardoni v Prosperity Bank), Prosperity Bank is a Texas-based bank. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]