Search for: "Thomas View" Results 7561 - 7580 of 12,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
(b. 1841), John Chipman Grey (b. 1839), Roscoe Pound (b. 1870), Arthur Corbin (b. 1874), and Wesley Hohfeld (b. 1879); they are all very different from each other; some of their thought is not very realist in our modern sense of that word, while the thought of others like Pound-- whose views were famously attacked by Karl Llewellyn-- is actually quite consistent with what we now think of as legal realism.In any case, these proto-realists greatly influenced the next generation, which… [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am by SHG
And it seems like that is like such a minority view,” adds Fleischman. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 7:55 pm
He made the point that in his view there has never been a US Supreme Court opinion that has been more ignored and defied than State Farm v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am by Adam Gillette
Ostensibly, the post is the story of Thomas Dwight Witherspoon, a Presbyterian preacher who served with Company G of the 11th Mississippi Infantry. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 2:54 pm
Philip Morris Inc. (1976), 27 C.P.R. (2d) 205 and Thomas J. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by Jason Shinn
But on August 15, 2013, she was fired by the majority owner, Thomas Rost, because he found it unacceptable based on his religious views. [read post]
On April 18, Judge Sanchez heard oral arguments regarding Google’s ongoing challenge to Magistrate Judge Thomas Rueter’s order compelling the company to comply with an SCA warrant in a case raising similar issues. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am by Micha Nandaraj Gallo
”  This harm, in the view of the Seventh Circuit, was sufficiently concrete and particularized for the purposes of establishing Article III standing. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Think Progress, Ian Millhiser argues that despite “his professed admiration for Justice Scalia, Gorsuch’s record is more consistent with Scalia’s much more conservative former colleague, Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Margaret Wood
I also update the most-viewed bills, the Congress.gov enhancements page, and the Congress.gov Gov Delivery notifications for each new release. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 8:02 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Finally, no technical difficulty was demonstrated in achieving the solution, since the demonstration of a difficulty did not concern the solution itself, but the phase II clinical trials, which could be envisaged by the person skilled in the art, with a view to confirming the hypothesis of a daily dose, and which should only be carried out with great caution. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 10:56 am by jonathanturley
At the same time, 26 million Americans now reportedly view violence as justified. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Once we determine that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause was originally understood as containing some requirement of proportionality, and the overwhelming evidence is that it does (I will explain in a later post why the Scalia-Thomas view to the contrary is erroneous), the difficult task is determining the benchmark:  to what do federally imposed punishments have to be proportionate? [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
Layton’s recommendations caused his customers to incur unnecessary sales charges, and were unsuitable in view of the frequency and cost of the transactions. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:03 am by Amy Howe
” Gorsuch went on to explain that, although the state court’s errors in Stuart’s case were in his view obvious, they were also understandable, because the Supreme Court’s opinions on the confrontation clause – and in particular a 2012 case in which no rule was able to garner a majority of the votes – “have sown confusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
  In Cunningham, three justices - Breyer, Kennedy and Alito - concluded that her opinion was inconsistent with the opinion she joined in Booker, the decision from two years ago that the Federal Guidelines were, on balance, more constitutional than not.But in Booker itself, four different justices - Scalia, Thomas, Stevens and Souter - concluded in their messily bickering way that the "remedial opinion" Justice Ginsburg… [read post]