Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 741 - 760 of 3,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division found that PERB's determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record and although the vehicle requests were routinely approved, that fact did not create a past practice nor divest DOT of its right to exercise its discretion in granting or denying the requests or the use of the vehicle for commuting to and from work.Citing State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, the court held that "because… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division found that PERB's determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record and although the vehicle requests were routinely approved, that fact did not create a past practice nor divest DOT of its right to exercise its discretion in granting or denying the requests or the use of the vehicle for commuting to and from work.Citing State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, the court held that "because… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:09 pm by Pamela Fasick
In this action the plaintiffs argued that they fell within that exception when they were ordinary citizens in a public park who were attacked and stabbed by four inmates of the California Department of Corrections who were living in the the defendant's residential substance abuse treatment facility. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court also granted leave to appeal in Wolf v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:55 am
Patsalos to grant the Town’s petition to stay the arbitration; the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed.The Appellate Division pointed out that the arbitrator in the disciplinary action apparently did not directly address the question of whether, pursuant to the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, the employee could be suspended without pay for more than 30 days pending disposition of the disciplinary charges against him.The Appellate Division rejected… [read post]