Search for: "Jason v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 1,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 New York Law JournalBy Jason GrantJanuary 26, 2021  In a reversal of the lower court, a state appeals court has reinstated a claim for racial employment discrimination leveled by a Black former assistant manager against the hugely popular Carlo’s Bakery location near Times Square and that store’s senior general manager. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
Jason Plotzker , an 8-page opinion, Judge May writes:After Jason Plotzker breached one lease, Olympus Properties, LLC, repudiated a subsequent lease. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:37 am by SHG
Much as the First Circuit held in Glik v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
Of the discussion on IPBiz of Carhart's book Lost triumph: Lee's real plan at Gettysburg - and why it failed, IPBiz found a link at encyclopedia.com (apparently) to text by Jason M. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:21 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Jason Hughes, No. 101,959 (Lyon)(consolidated)State appealJulia S. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am by Holman
by Chris Holman As reported in posts by Dennis and Jason, the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Amgen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 8:54 pm
Williams, Third Party Consent Searches After Georgia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
State of Indiana – Chicago lawyer Jason Stiehl of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Sunshine backed bonds – time to look on the sunny side? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Robert Phillips, No. 96,754 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
Court Rules Illegal Immigrants Have 2nd Amendment Rights:  In the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state court majority went on to rely upon the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the 2004 decision in the Yarborough v. [read post]