Search for: "John Doe, II"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
The Director does not even depend on Congress for annual appropriations. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
– John Jenkins [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Part II praised Justice Gorsuch's decisiveness. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:13 am
John Does 1-10 et al (3:20-cv-01161) On July 17, Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum brought suit in the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
II and NavSight Holdings. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
John Hodges-Howell and Peter G. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
Three Washington electors, Peter Chiafalo, Levi Guerra, and Esther John (the Electors), violated their pledges to support Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:36 am
Article II of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
In Part I of his opinion, Thomas concluded that Article II does not “speak[] directly to a State’s power over elector voting. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am
Key Findings Allowing companies to fully and immediately deduct investments in structures is one of the most cost-efficient ways lawmakers can stimulate investment, create jobs, and boost GDP during a post-pandemic recovery. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:45 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote on behalf of the Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Maybe the common law does not define the relevant baselines – but why does not RFRA, as construed by Hobby Lobby, define the “neutral” baseline treatment to which employers are entitled? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:43 am
Indeed, the word “amosite” (or the word grunerite) does not appear in the New England Journal of Medicine article . [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
”)And another feature—also largely ignored by the Court—of the Constitution’s text concerning the presidential election process, namely, the time lag between the selection of electors and the casting of their votes for President that the Constitution contemplates, does affirmatively argue in favor of some constitutionally guaranteed discretion. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall decided that Jefferson was not immune from either testifying in the case or responding to the subpoena. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:16 am
International relations theorist John Mearsheimer notes that the approach [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
The great Chief Justice, John Marshall, said the president does not “stand exempt from the general provisions of the constitution” nor, Roberts added, "in particular, the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee that those accused have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses for their defense. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
Madison, and wrote, “Put in common parlance, the tail (one unconstitutional provision) does not wag the dog (the rest of the codified statute or the Act as passed by Congress). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Then the Senate split 10-10 on the subject, and Vice President John Adams broke the tie in favor of presidential power. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
In recent weeks, there’s been a surge in assertions that the bar exam does “nothing,” is “pointless,” is “worthless,” and so on. [read post]
