Search for: "Matter of CL" Results 741 - 760 of 1,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Jack Goldsmith
Thus, even though, as a general matter, Congress had authority under its constitutional powers related to war and the military to enact section 1035(d), that provision would have been unconstitutional to the extent it applied to the unique circumstances of this transfer. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a March 16, 2015 post on the CLS Blue Sky Blog (here), Columbia Law School Professor John Coffee takes a detailed look at the draft question. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
CLS Bank Intern., 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014) (subject matter eligibility) Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:43 am
Our reader Marcin tells us that his ambition is to be a patent attorney and that right now he is trying to get his head round software patenting, seeking to understand the differences between US and Europe in the wake of the US Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp v CLS Bank International [on which see this guest Katpost from Nick Transier here], He refers to the subject matter exclusion provisions of Article 52 of the European Patent Convention… [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
It is a fact well known to certain Episcopalians—both those who have left the Episcopal Church (USA) and those who have remained—that ECUSA and its dioceses have followed a pattern of suing any church that chooses to leave for another Anglican jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Before the court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary claim (Count I), defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction plaintiffs’ alternate breach of fiduciary duty claim (Count II), and defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim plaintiffs’ legislative takings claim (Count III). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
CLS Bank, where the Court took an active role in defining the contours of the prohibited subject matter areas, the Court explicitly stated in all cases that the inventions at issue were not patent eligible under §101. [read post]