Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2010, 9:58 am
Laws prohibiting discrimination trump patient preference regarding the race of health care providers, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled in Chaney v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:22 am
Evidence that a superior or supervisor induced him to forego any vacation time during that year for any reason or that he refrained from using vacation time the entire year because of noncontractual duties.The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling, holding that under the circumstances, Gratto was not entitled to the cash value of his 45 days of unused vacation when he was involuntarily separated.This is similar to the general rule with respect to State workers… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
Secretary of United States Army, No. 10-1172 (Dec. 14, 2011). [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:23 pm
The Supreme Court, in Meacham v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:18 pm
The insulting-words statute is designed to punish offensive language that is so inflammatory as to amount to “fighting words,” which the United States Supreme Court has held to be outside the protection of the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:06 pm
The former, said the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts last month in Martin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 12:19 pm
According to the Plaintiff, it is a violation of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution:[T]he defendants have irrationally and intentionally treated the plaintiff differently from others identically situated to the plaintiff, in violation of the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as enforced through Sections 1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of… [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
” Richardson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
” Richardson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 7:40 am
In fact, the stated purpose of the edict was to cut off contact between the troopers and the community group that had apparently vexed the major. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 6:56 pm
” EEOC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Board of Trustees, and City of Hayward v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
You can, if you are interested, read more about habeas procedure in the United States in the article you can find here. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
Likewise, the state high court agreed that the facility had not retaliated against her by trying to force her to transfer units after she engaged in protected activity. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
Employers and supervisors in the United States should consider these traits and expectations when managing and evaluating Latino workers. [read post]
