Search for: "US v. James Smith"
Results 741 - 760
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:21 am
Many of the IP blogs have been quiet on the en banc Ariad decision, which represented a stunningly thorough repudiation of positions taken by a number of IP professors.Patently-O noted:My sense is that Ariad v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Mueller of Burns, Wall, Smith and Mueller, P.C., Denver, Colorado. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
He has used that power to build coalitions and has become the undisputed leader of the resistance against the conservatives on the Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
& Associates, Peter Smith of Law Offices of Peter Smith & Associates, Daniel Nobel, Richard Levit of Levitt & Kaizer(Defendant); Eric Proshansky, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Law Department (the City of New York); David Paldy, Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Tax Enforcement, Special Investigations Unit ( the State of New York); AUSAs James Miskiewicz, John Durham, Diane Leonardo-Beckman.Court Denies Victim’s Request for… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Fairhurst, Justice James M. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal (free registration required) reports this morning that James Feldman, a former Assistant to the Solicitor General who has argued forty-five times before the Supreme Court, will defend Chicago’s strict handgun ban in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 19, 2010 Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 19, 2010 Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:09 am
Smith (08-1402) by Harvard law student James Bickford. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
” In the last of the four favorable decisions, the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered a new penalty phase proceeding in James Aaron Miller v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:06 am
In 1997, defense lawyers uncovered handwritten notes from Pickard indicating he had used Smith to garner Johnson's statements. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 6:10 pm
In 1991, in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:20 am
Heimbach, Michael V. [read post]
