Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm
Hanley v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council is an appeal against the service of a Prohibition Order. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
Round 1: “If the Legislature wishes…” On February 5, 2010, the SJC issued a fairly conservative, by-the-book decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
In return for granting the right to exclude others from making or using a patented invention, the inventor must disclose or conversely not conceal from the public the preferred embodiment. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
With that in mind, we offer our thanks to Gothamist, who provides this story about Plaintiff Monserrate Luna, who has appealed an order granting summary judgment against her in last year's Luna v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
The plaintiff was further ordered not to delete or alter any of the information on the accounts in the meantime.It is noted, parenthetically, that a recent decision with the same result in favor of production of information in discovery was handed down in the Suffolk County, New York trial court level case of Romano v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
As Lord Diplock put it in Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Limited ([1979] AC 440 at 450A to C): “If the way that courts behave cannot be hidden from the public ear and eye, this provides a safeguard against judicial arbitrariness or idiosyncrasy and maintains the public confidence in the administration of justice. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
See Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
The Fifth Circuit reversed the summary judgment motion that had been granted in favor of the licensee at the district level. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:28 am
Gemalto SA v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
The court rejected plaintiff's argument that the US Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
Abstract below: This Article posits that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
Just as in Lopez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:56 am
The patent was granted with 10 claims but, after opposition, only one claim was left, being: "The use of maltotriitol to modify or control the form of maltitol crystals. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
My view is that the use and occupation charges being levied at the same level as rent, where the latter involves a repairing obligation is surely key. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
Now join us on Facebook! [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But in Yick Wo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
