Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:35 am
’ ” United Slate, Local 307 v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:54 pm
Liu v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
Third, in Price v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:40 am
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., an Ohio federal court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In addition, [Van Praagh] claims [Gratton] has used the Van Praagh Trademark while offering her spiritual medium services at various venues throughout the United States and on her websites, Facebook Page, Twitter account and YouTube channel. . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
Tooey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:32 pm
The Court relied on Williamson County v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:32 pm
The Court relied on Williamson County v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
I heard some grumbles because the organization was initially named the “United States Trademark Association” and therefore the formation question could be misinterpreted. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
United States Fire Insurance Co., 92 Cal. [read post]
