Search for: "Ex Parte Mays"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 12,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 4:31 am
Some people believe me about the harassment part, but many are skeptical. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:59 pm
Also, trade secrets literally walk out of the door with ex-employees and others, who may simply put them on to a flash drive. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm
Part may also be the embrace of “permissionless innovation” as a norm. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Some parts of the CFAA requires a higher quantitative showing of damages, but many cases easily clear that threshold. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am
Clarified that § 11.305 (relating to prohibited ex parte communications with, e.g., judges, administrative patent and trademark judges, and "employee[s] or officer[s] of the Office") does not "prevent ex parte communication that is authorized by law, rule or court order, in an ex parte proceeding." [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 am
from Ex parte ArnoldOf background:The Examiner has rejected claims 1, 2, 41 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:51 am
Once parentage is ordered, parents may then ask the court, as part of the same case, to order child custody, visitation and child support orders. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
It would probably have helped the patentee if the description had included broadening statements regarding the type of data that may be generated, stored and transmitted. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:13 am
. ***** ABA opines on judges using social media The majority of jurisdictions that have addressed the issue of judges having social media connections have concluded that it is generally permissible for judges to become online “friends” with attorneys appearing before them, as long as the judges are careful to avoid the appearance of impropriety, avoid ex parte communications, and otherwise ensure compliance with applicable ethical rules. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:20 am
From within Ex parte Liebermann, 10/718,023We find Lynt explicitly discloses the disputed limitations of claims 1,22 and 27, and thus we affirm the rejections of these claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
The appellant prevailed in Ex parte Karau with PTAB noting:See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017 (CCPA 1967) (the examiner hasthe initial duty of supplying the requisite factual basis and may not, becauseof doubts that the invention is patentable, resort to speculation, unfoundedassumptions, or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factualbasis) As to 112 P 6:In otherwords, in order to meet a “means plus function” limitation, the prior art… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Since monopoly power is the power to control price or exclude competition, Google’s high “market share” may not in fact reflect any actual market power. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:26 pm
There are a few notable things about Peter Hansmeier's ex parte application. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:49 am
What's the coherent reason for crediting foreign taxes but not property taxes, when the value of property may simply be a multiple of annual earnings? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
The attorney must certify whether the motion is being provided to the other side or ex parte (only to the court) and why providing a copy to the other side would aggravate the injury or harm. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
The injunction prohibited Walls from: (1) Communicating . . . with any person, entity, organization, agency or religious institution regarding or concerning Klein . . . concerning any allegation or matter set forth in the Agreement and any exhibits attached thereto, except as may be necessary to defend herself in this action, or to respond to an investigation by a governmental agency initiated by that agency; (2) Publishing or attempting to publish on any website, including but not limited… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:00 pm
The first part -- "based only on the value of the component that implements the standard" -- is an argument Apple emphasizes all the time in the policy and antitrust contexts (as well as in litigation). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
(Both the prosecutor and the defense attorney from the Ex Parte Robbins case, Mike McDougal and Brian Wice, testified at the senate committee hearing.) [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
May 4, 2012); and in his July 12, 2012, decision in Valkavich v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
(Any communication to a court -- written or oral -- made by a party without involving or notifying the other parties to a case is deemed "ex parte" and hence improper; judges are not allowed to receive such communications.)However, I am reliably informed by counsel in the case that the Court has treated the letter as a supplemental amicus filing, so that it is now an official part of the record in the case. [read post]
