Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 7641 - 7660 of 10,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2010, 7:30 pm
He does not return to Judea, however, because Archilaus is just as cruel and arbitrary as his father was (Mt 2:22). [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:38 pm
The four main elements are: 1) Tone from the top; 2) Risk assessment; 3) Program design and control; and 4) Response and remediation. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:26 pm by Brian Shiffrin
I told them that if they felt there wasn't PBRD with respect to the other kids, but John Doe was a strong witness, they shouldn't say, well he's the strongest, so let's convict on his counts. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:18 am by Lewis Gainor
In cases such as these, there are two notions that play into the case: 1) ambiguity; and 2) vagueness. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm by Adrian Lurssen
" Read more>>- Protecting Innovation in Cloud Computing (by Christopher Palermo):"...does cloud computing require fundamental changes in the way that practitioners approach patent drafting and claiming, or other issues of innovation or intellectual property protection? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:00 pm by Jeff Vail
 How does the need for this kind of training meet with the needs of the ad hoc firm? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
(Silica)  1, 1-2 (Nov. 2003). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:54 am by John L. Welch
Section 2(c) is not limited in scope to full names, but encompasses "surnames, shortened names, nicknames, etc., so long as the name in question does, in fact, 'identify' a particular living individual. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
The residual privacy expectation Weaver retained in his vehicle, while perhaps small, was at least adequate to support his claim of a violation of his constitutional right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.2. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
Unlike weak Pareto, strong Pareto does permit some relatively robust conclusions. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am by pfriedman
” They are: (1) political exploitation of the gap between the Furman decision and popular opinion; (2) adversarial legal proceedings featuring cultural tensions between capital punishment and liberal humanism; (3) the political association of capital punishment with larger political and cultural issues, such as civil rights, states’ rights, and crime control; (4) demands for revenge; and (5) the emotional power of imagining killing and death. [read post]