Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 13,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am
“[T]he test for sufficiency is whether the disclosure of the application relied upon reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art that the inventor ha[d] possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filing date. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
To make matters worse, the appellate court in Manpower proceeded to attempt to justify its reversal on grounds of “[t]he latitude we afford to statisticians employing regression analysis, a proven statistical methodology used in a wide variety of contexts. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
§ 1806(f) when a notified defendant files a motion to suppress. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:38 pm
Deckers Outdoor Corp., 259 F.3d 1101, 1107 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The Respondent relied on s. 239(2)(f) of the Municipal Act, which permits Council meetings to be closed to the public if the subject matter of the meeting is advice to which solicitor-client privilege attaches. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm
The Case of Re F – another adoption case. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm
This is “Occurrence and Levels of Fecal Indicators and Pathogenic Bacteria in Market-Ready Recycled Organic Matter Composts” (9), a study submitted in early 2008 and published in 2009. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:28 pm
Kopykake Enters., 302 F.3d 1352, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
§20.63(f)), but probably not found it bloggable. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
Kevin T. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
Judge Michael T. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
Judge Michael T. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
The prevailing plaintiffs attorney in this matter, Robert F. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
The prevailing plaintiffs attorney in this matter, Robert F. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:15 am
Request for Unpleaded Relief Matter of McCoun (Railroad Bagel Express, Inc.), Short Form Order, Index No. 11-24578 (Sup Ct Suffolk County July 17, 2013) (Thomas F. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
” In re Kumar, 418 F.3d 1361, 1367 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
Griffith, and Senior Judge Stephen F. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 238 F. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 (U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:07 pm
In our blog post from 2012, we noted that ”[i]t will be interesting to see whether the Schafer preservation rule is followed by the Court in decisions to come. [read post]