Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7641 - 7660 of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am by Larry Ribstein
He summarizes three cases reaching three results:  Mehraban v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
– The California Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
Perhaps that's not true in Kelo, where there seems to be a lot more popular reaction, but I didn't get a strong enough sense of evidence to show that anyone in your dissenting group was trying to be a norm entrepreneur at the state level to apply a different rule than enunciated as a floor in Scott v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:52 pm by Tracy Coenen
What can you do if you’re in favor of keeping the strong anti-SLAPP law in Nevada? [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am by Guest Author
While he was chairing the Section, he co-authored the ABA’s amicus curiae brief in INS v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:32 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
For example, in VL Systems, Inc. v. [read post]