Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 15,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
As we argued in an amicus brief filed recently in People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:20 pm
As regards, s.112 of the Patents Act 1977, the "Level 4" maximum fine still stands at £2,500 ..., this sum not having (yet) been increased from the figure decreed in 1991. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
Eleonora seizes the chance, sinks her teeth into the second decision post-Usedsoft and tries to figure out what comes next. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
You can read the full Hartford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am
Solomon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
So it delegates to experts, within parameters, sometimes quite broad, sometimes more narrow, the day-to-day responsibility of figuring out the best ways to fight environmental dangers. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
” TCCC provided evidence of sale figures, marketing expenditure, independent media coverage, and survey evidence. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:42 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:57 am
Most recently, HHJ Pelling decided in Jack Wills v House of Fraser that, on an account of profits assessment, it will in many cases be appropriate for an infringer to be able to deduct certain overheads from its net profit figure, as well as apply an apportionment of profits which relate specifically to the infringement. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
Go figure. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:59 am
Truescents LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:40 am
Intel's reply brief cites to Laitram v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am
Circuit’s timely decision in McKeever v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:57 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:36 pm
” Finjan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
problem to SCOV to figure out. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Seward,supra note v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
