Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 7721 - 7740 of 21,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am by Schachtman
” These generalizations cannot be tested with jury research in which both sides’ presentations are often no longer than 60 minutes, or so. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir.2001).Under the first two parts of the test, as applied in thepatent context, the question is what minimum contactsare necessary to establish personal jurisdiction over anonresident defendant for a declaratory judgment ofnoninfringement or invalidity of a patent. (...)Under the third part of the test, however,this court has held that it is improper to predicatepersonal jurisdiction on the act of sending ordinary ceaseand desist letters into a forum, without more. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Matthew David Brozik
On appeal to the Ninth Circuit, the plaintiffs argued that the lower court “misapplied the primary significance test and failed to recognize the importance of verb use. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Donna Sokol
Ryan Hart, the plaintiff, was a former quarterback at Rutgers University. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Writer/editor Dan Flynn was served with  a subpoena from the plaintiffs during early stages of this litigation but was not required to provide any information or to testify. [read post]
  Several days later, Plaintiff indicated to Darlington’s human resources representative that she was currently using medical marijuana and that as a result she would test positive on the pre-employment drug test. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:53 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
A defendant is strictly liable for a plaintiff’s injury if the product is in a condition that is unreasonably dangerous. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Charles Bieneman
’” The court rejected the defendant’s analogy, and agreed with the plaintiff “that the patents create a solution to a computer-centric problem which is not addressed by the prior art. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiffs allege that the defendants allegedly had failed to disclose that the engines were designed in a way to allow the engines to meet emissions control tests, while at the same time the engines operating under normal conditions emitted pollutants at levels that exceeded allowed emissions control levels. [read post]
” The defense could still win this discovery dispute, but it would first have to clear the high hurdle of this balancing test. [read post]
The two claims at issue stated: “Last year’s champion won again, this time with USA Today,” and “Persil Original didn’t only beat Tide Original, it beat every detergent tested. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The FDA’s distinction between approval and clearance wasn’t the test, but rather whether “the false message will necessarily and unavoidably be received by the consumer. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “the balancing test that the Court puts forward for when a special election should be held makes great sense, and will extend beyond the racial gerrymandering cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Casto’s article The ATS Cause of Action Is Sui Generis was cited in the following article: Anonymous, Clarifying Kiobel’s “Touch and Concern” Test, 130 HARV. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
  In false advertising cases, the governing test is what consumers, themselves, think – not what FDA thinks. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
  In false advertising cases, the governing test is what consumers, themselves, think – not what FDA thinks. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Lyle Roberts
May 9, 2017), the plaintiffs claimed that the company “knew that the drug they were testing would fail long before that information was released to the public. [read post]