Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 8,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 3:36 pm
Billing v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:56 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
As an empirical matter, lawsuits have proved extremely ineffective and inefficient as a means of enforcing congressional oversight demands. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
”[14] The Release also compared the Section 404 requirements against Section 13(b)(2) by citing the Commission’s interpretive release from 1981: We have previously stated, as a matter of policy, that under Section 13(b)(2) “every public company needs to establish and maintain records of sufficient accuracy to meet adequately four interrelated objectives: appropriate reflection of corporate transactions and the disposition of assets; effective administration… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:35 am
Although most people haven't heard of it, they have a big stake in the integrity and honesty of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 3:06 pm
by Paul Bland Although most people haven't heard of it, they have a big stake in the integrity and honesty of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
This sentence points to footnote 65: "[W]e sympathize with the plight of Google-Motorola, which was investigated for antitrust violations for suing to enforce its patents only in response to being sued itself by Apple and Microsoft. [...] [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
Two weeks later, months of conflict came to a head in United States v. al-Nashiri as the military judge overseeing the matter, Col. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Douglas W. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
This is hardly the kind of split in lower-court authority the Court likes to have before wading into a matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Barker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm
Yesterday in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
But the parishes in the matter counter-argued that the challenge was only mooted to the extent of the 200-transaction threshold but not the $100,000 threshold, and also that the new law would not take effect until August 1, 2023, ostensibly in a bid to persuade the court not to dismiss the matter and to issue a decision that Louisiana’s decentralized system is constitutional. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
