Search for: "Bullet v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
After searching his small rental, the cops indeed found weed, two dollars' worth, and one legal handgun -- the one he was clutching when the bullets ripped into him. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
From today’s Dejoria v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 4:16 am
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Cambridge v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:27 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:05 am
Platt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
The developments are:Enactment of the Employment Permits (Amendment) Act 2014 - see end of blog post below.The UK Supreme Court decision in Hounga v Allen - see the fourth bullet below.Here's the revised blog post in full: In a very important decision in 2012, Hussein v The Labour Court [2012] IEHC 364, Hogan J. found that a migrant worker (Mr Muhammad Younis) who had been exploited by his employer could not claim under the working time legislation,… [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:50 am
The Hales were owners of a house on agricultural land about one mile southeast of a shooting range in Ward County, which is used to train local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
And it’s a scheme that is in significant ways more burdensome than the federal rule (see bullet 2 above) approved — by an 8-to-7 en banc vote — by NRA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:36 am
However in Spencer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
Predictions: A well known quote of John Wayne is “Out here, due process is a bullet. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, the distinction between business conduct and other conduct is no magic bullet. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
Harris v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
The court analyzed the case Fraley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 am
United States Steel Corp. for deciding whether the items at issue were “clothes” within the meaning of this provision (Rosano v Township of Teaneck, June 10, 2014, Fisher, D). [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm
., Matter of Carmelo E. and Green v. [read post]
