Search for: "Citizen v. Johnson*" Results 761 - 780 of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Shanahan, 15-1307, in which the non-citizen contested his classification under the detention scheme. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
Chance for Release: You are most likely to be released if you have little or no criminal history, if you have solid employment and family ties in your community, if you are a United States Citizen, and if you are not charged with a serious drug trafficking offense or crime of violence. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:25 am
He also knew that polls consistently showed that at least 70% of Michigan citizens favored rescinding. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
(It's an interesting question whether MEJA would cover crimes by foreign contractors as well as U.S. citizens - the language of the statutes could be argued either way.)There was a flurry of interest in MEJA in the wake of Abu Ghraib, where two civilian contractors were implicated - and it turned out that they couldn't be prosecuted because they had been hired by the Department of the Interior instead of DoD. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
 Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
That is a harder question than maybe it appears at first blush.Last Monday, on this blog, Professor Colb suggested that there may be times when civility is not appropriate, such as when Professor Robert George of Princeton University was at Cornell talking about the new Texas anti-abortion law and "spouted the bogus talking point that other fans of SB8 have been repeating, "comparing the new anti-choice weapon  to other statutes enlisting private citizens to enforce the law. [read post]